Tuesday, December 18, 2007

<--just look at it

I've added a few changes. We now have our own flash animated starry rainbow. Click it to make it go again.

12 comments:

pimp-a-lot bear said...

looks very cool! is it possible to enjoy it full screen?

pimp-a-lot bear said...

when I scroll down and up, the rainbow has disappeared. :(

How are the pictures on the left sidebar sorted? nr. of posts? coolness? color?

cybrbeast said...

I like the animation, but like this it really doesn't fit into the site. That box is fugly, I say integrate it into the design or remove.

I've changed the captain rainbow logo again.

cybrbeast said...

It isn't really flash, cause it isn't vectored. You could easily make a transparent animated GIF out of it and put it on the site in a nice way.

Douchebag said...

and how does interactivity work in gif?

Unknown said...

what if we'd wanna expand the animation? Now it's in flash we can do anything we want with it while it's about just as hard to create in gif.

oh yeah, try putting your versions of psd's on the ftp-server. I keep working from that file.

annom said...

The names + carebears make it a little bit cluttered, but our blog can handle a little clutter :)

I think we can remove the contributors on the right now.

Kamiel said...

its looking nice!
Maybe the rainbowboys flash animation can line with the carebear boxes so the vertical lines are more continues.

To the right you got away the contributors but you forgeted to get away the text:"contributors"

For the rest its looking dam sexy!

annom said...

wow, the new rainbow is better!

In IE our blog looks like shit though!

Douchebag said...

yeah, but appearently it's been shit for a while in IE.

annom said...

Yes, but by far not as crappy as now.

I like how the design is wider now.

Unknown said...

yeah, since we got rid of the contributors I've had a lot more room on the right. So placed everything more to right and gave the 3 columns more space in between to make it seem less cluttered.

I'll try fixing the IE thing. I'm just afraid something fundamental has gone wrong and I'd have to re-do the HTML all over again.